The official definition of a “pogrom” is “a violent riot aimed at massacre or persecution of an ethnic or religious group, particularly one aimed at Jews.”
Without a doubt, the mainstream narrative of the “Holocaust” would be the most recent example of a “Pogrom”. But does the official definition of and narrative of a “pogrom” hold up to any scrutiny? Were the “pogroms” simply a way of a Nation responding to jewish criminal elements deeply embedded in their society? Were “pogroms” really a senseless massacre
of innocent people as the mainstream and other special interests want the public to believe?
Mainstream history; through television, Hollywood films, books and newspapers has always claimed that Zionist jews were innocent victims
of orgies of mindless violence during “pogroms”. Other narratives claim that the “pogrom”s throughout history were a proper response
to local citizens who found themselves under siege in their own country by a international jewish mafia hellbent on using every method in their disposal to further the interests of Zionism, including acts of terrorism.
For decades, the White Nationalists within America (labeled as “White Supremacists”) have always claimed that the country was a nation
under the control of Z.O.G. (Zionist Occupation Government). They pointed to the jews who were/are in control of every key industry, in addition to Wall Street, the Media, our banking system (Federal Reserve) and our various government/political institutions. If true, is here any historical precedence for this in the history of the “pogroms”?
“Investigations carried out by special committees discovered that in the decades prior to partition, Polish Jewry had enjoyed a demographic explosion, with Jews now representing almost 20% of the entire population. In addition, it was discovered that Jews controlled a full 75% of Polish exports, and that many were now spilling out of over-populated urban centres into the countryside, making a living by monopolising the sale of liquor to peasants.”
In the history of “pogroms”, one finds the reoccurring theme of a nation finding themselves under seige by a jewish mafia that had a death grip of sorts on one or more key domestic industries. Not only were criminal elements involved in all sorts of enterprises, but the profits were being used to fund the establishment of a jewish theocracy in Palestine, the heart of the Muslim world.
Contrary to what one would expect, this American pogrom was led by Ulysses S. Grant. He was also later a US President, and at the time this happened was General for the Union, not the Confederacy during the Civil War. As a general, he formalized the pogrom as a sort of “Executive Order”. On December 17, 1862, he issued General Orders Number Eleven:
“The Jews, as a class, violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department, and also Department orders, are hereby expel[led] from the Department. Within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this order by Post Commanders, they will see that all of this class of people are furnished with passes and required to leave, and any one returning after such notifications, will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners unless furnished with permits from these Head Quarters. No permits will be given these people to visit Head Quarters for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits.”
So why did Grant issue such an order? To find the answer, one needs to understand that by this time, Slavery was indeed being made an issue for the Union, who was losing the Civil War to the Confederacy.
“Northern businessmen, operating under licenses issued by the U.S. Treasury Department, acquired cotton and other commodities from Confederate sources in exchange for manufactured goods, including military supplies.”
Apparently, General Grant discovered a jewish mafia was operating in Kentucky and Tennessee and subverting the established laws.
Surprisingly, even a mainstream source such as Wikipedia confirms Grant’s 1862 Order Number Eleven was a reaction against a jewish mafia
operating in his midst:
Union military commanders in the South were responsible for administering the trade licenses and trying to control the black market in Southern cotton, as well as for conducting the war. Grant issued the order in an effort to reduce corruption.
“The order went into immediate effect; Army officers ordered Jewish traders and their families in Holly Springs, Oxford, Mississippi, and Paducah, Kentucky to leave the territory. Grant may not have intended such results; his headquarters expressed no objection to the continued presence of Jewish sutlers, as opposed to cotton traders. But, the wording of the order addressed all Jews, regardless of occupation, and it was implemented accordingly.”
Grant’s campaign against the jews was apparently such a success, that he was elected President a few years later in 1869.
It is safe to say that the bloodless and non-violent expulsion of a jewish mafia “tribe” is the correct definition of what a “pogrom” actually is?
To defend against such efforts, the jews went on the offensive, setting up secret vigilante groups. The setting up of an extra-judicial system was mainly to protect established jewish criminial interest. In examining the Russian “pogrom”, it was noted that “the Jews of the Russian Empire had evidently retained the kahal of pre-partition Polish Jewry. The kahal was a formal system of Jewish communal leadership and government, entirely separate from the Russian state.”
Shockingly, similar jewish extra-judicial or vigilante criminal justice systems still operate openly today in American society. It has been noted
that several operate in jewish enclaves within the New York City borough of Brooklyn.
Jewish media themselves are considered to be good sources of information on how they operate.
Interestingly, governmental entities within the United States cast a blind eye to this jewish vigilante system, only breaking it up when it becomes too out of hand, and bodies start lining the streets.
Most of the time, the jewish vigilante system is protected by our official “government” one. Here’s an example of how the Brooklyn District Attorney took a blind eye approach to the sexual molestation of children right under his nose.
We can expect that a main reason why the Brooklyn District Attorney Hynes cast a blind eye was because he received lucrative campaign contributions from the jewish community.
These secret jewish vigilante courts have operated around the world for untold centuries. They are known as the Bet Din.
As previously mentioned, occasionally they will attract the eyes of local law enforcement when the body count becomes too large to ignore.
Unfortunately for the rest of us, these secret systems of jewish vigilante justice work hand-in-hand with jewish organized crime.
These vigilante jewish systems of justice operate not only openly in US society, ignored by the authorities, but have their own published rules for administering justice.
Other recent examples of how they operate openly:
While the “right wing” in the US, constantly cries about the imposition of “Sharia Law” by Islam, they cast a blind eye to the long established practice of imposing jewish law on the gentile populace:
While the US Federal government, at the behest of the jewish lobby has orchestrated the promotion of a large soviet style snitching program; “If you see something, say something”, apparently other laws apply to jews:
The majority of mainstream historians have long displayed an aversion to the idea that Jewish economic practices have played a significant role historically in provoking “pogroms”. It also appears that jewish domination of industry in various countries have contributed not only to unprecedented corruption but to the “pogrom” itself. Historically, a “pogrom” is a legal maneuver designed to remove a criminal element that has deeply embedded itself into a society. A more correct description of a “pogrom” would be a legal, non-violent “expulsion” or “exile”.
Any inter-ethnic violence that broke out in “pogroms” throughout history was not rooted in irrationality, but a legal attempt to weaken the economic power of the Jewish monopoly or organized criminal syndicate. The question remains, is whether the US will do anything of the sort in the near future? Looking at the sheepish behavior of clueless American who are blindly subservient to all forms of authority, the answer has to be “No.” But with the Age of Trump coming, that might change
dramatically in the near future!